336
they attempt to derive benefit from dual
nationality.
desirable to effect a compromise during
It would no doubt be found
the negotiationsjad His Majesty's Government
abandon their clasin
might then, if necessary, offer to refuse to
protect persons who have no bona fide inten-
and
tion of retaining a Colonial domicile or whe
appeal for
only slain British protection when in danger
of Chinese law.
11.
Sir F.Lugard would appear to regard
the third class which he mentions, viz.the
children born outside the King's dominions of
parents naturalised in a Colony, as entitled
to be regarded as British subjects if the
father has divested himself of Chinese
nationality. r.Harcourt doubts whether
this view could be maintained.
He is
advised that as naturalization is only
effective in the naturalising colony, the
children of a naturalised subject born out
'of the King's dominions could not be
British subjects and the fact that the
father had divested himself of Chinese
Conson
amil
A
nationality
FT.
is born.
nationality could only have the effect
of definitely induing the child with the
nationality of the country in which it
but he In any case ir Hercourt, thinks
that it would be desirable to lay claim
to the right to protect such persons in
order to secure concessions as regards
other classes, if necessary.
12. Sir F.Lugard appears to
consider that persons in the fourth class
which he mentions are British subjects
only if born in the King's dominions;
and it would seen that he bases his
view on the same ground as he gives in
regard to the third class, viz that
"our contention that place of birth
decides nationality would appear to
Mr.Harcourt is advised
shut them out."
that the Governor is under a mis-
apprehension, since by British law any
person born on British territory is a
British
No comments yet.
Private notes are available after approval.